Monday, March 29, 2021

How To Kill God


 

Let's kill God.

God needs to die and we humans can hate him out of existence. Expose this liar for what it is and for who it is. Work everyday to turn his boot licking followers against him. God created us for his pleasure and our suffering is his pleasure.

  1. You were planned for God’s pleasure – to know him and love him and serve him; That’s what the word predestined means. (Ephesians 1:4, 11) (We have no choice in the matter. God is such a vile and evil entity that he created us for his sick pleasure)
  2. You were formed for God’s family – to find a home and family; We have literally been adopted into his family. (Ephesians 1:5, 2:19-22). (We were adopted by a child abuser into a sick and dysfunctional family by an ego-maniacal parent.)
  3. You were created to become like Christ – to become holy and blameless like Jesus. (Ephesians 1:3-4) (Christ was beaten and crucified. "God conned his own son and the last thing Jesus said to God was, "Father why hast thou forsaken me" God made a big deal saying that he gave his only begotten son to save the world that he God fucked up in the first place. The truth is Jesus was only dead for 18 hours and then he came back to life so God didn't do shit and he did not lose his son Jesus. The only begotten part is even more bullshit. God can have as many begotten children as he want.)
  4. You were shaped for serving God – with a unique blend of talents, skills and passion. He has given each of us spiritual gifts to build up the body of Christ. (Ephesians 4:11-16) (This is even more BS. Why would an all powerful God need us to serve him? God is very much like the God in Star Trek 5 who flipped out when Captain Kirk asked, What does God need with a star ship? The best part was when Spock killed God with a Klingon disrupter.)
  5. You were made for a mission – to introduce other people to God’s 5 purposes so that they too might live for the praise of his glory. (Ephesians 1:11-14) (God created us to be his marketing squad selling his lies to others so that they will lick his balls for all eternity. The truth is, no humans love God. They fear him. Even the most vile humans know deep down God is pure evil but they happily appease him by spreading his lies to other vile humans who are all to happy to lick God's balls.


The destruction of God is not only possible, it is imperative. Clearly, God needs us but we do not need him. We need God like we need a chronic migraine headache. God or the belief and promotion of God gave us the Dark Ages and the Middle East in currently in the Dark Ages. God plunged humanity into fear and ignorance. Had God been killed early on Humanity would be advanced in ways we cannot even comprehend. Look how scared God got at the tower of Babel fiasco in Genesis 11:17. And the LORD said, “If they have begun to do this as one people speaking the same language, then nothing they devise will be beyond them. 7Come, let Us go down and confuse their language, so that they will not understand one another’s speech.” 8So the LORD scattered them from there over the face of all the earth, and they stopped building the city.…

What a pathetic fucking cowardly evil fucking cruel asshole rat bastard God is. What a pathetic Karen you are God. Humanity was coming together to be peaceful and cooperative and God couldn't stand it. God loves chaos. God loves it when we suffer. God love to decline mercy. 

God invincibility is a facade, a lie and a ruse. God who goes by many names such as Yahweh, Allah, Jehovah, Elohim who takes credit for all creation yet the Bible which are his own words show him to be quite impotent, bumbling and kind of pathetic. In fact, one of God's many names is Jealous. I kid you not. In Exodus 34:14 it says, "Do not worship any other god, for the Lord whose name is Jealous, is a jealous god." How pathetic is that?  God fears us and he should. God is like the controlling, jealous and paranoid boyfriend who would beat the shit out of his girlfriend if he thinks she's interested in a better guy. God knows he is unworthy of our love and devotion. He's done nothing to earn it. Like the violent and jealous boyfriend God rules by fear. We all hate God and some of us admit it but most of us don't. Most of us comply for fear of his wraths but I suspect God is so delusional that he believes people adore him. I hate to break it to you God, only fools adore you and only cowards do your bidding same as the Nazi collaborators. Deep down, even your delusional ass kissers know what you are. You're a loser and you will be destroyed. Bye asshole. Enjoy oblivion.

How Do We Kill God?

Since we don't need God and since God needs us to survive we can start by rejecting him. We can then discredit him and then starve him of his adoration. God is both a grandiose narcissist and a vulnerable narcissist. God loves to play the victim. He allows his own son to die a horrible death then claims he did it  because he "so loved the world" the world that he fucked up in the first place. He previous solution for his fucked up world is to kill nearly every living thing in it. 
 
Narcissists hate rejection with a passion. It weakens them and it frustrates them. Narcissists are liars and liars hate the truth. Telling the truth on a narcissist is deadly to them. It short circuits them. God hates being exposed for the evil monster that he is. God likes to gaslight us. He does something really shitty to us and then he tries to blame us for it. God is like a wife beater who beats his wife and then claims it's the wife's fault that he beat her. Many wife beaters are evil and IMO should be killed. God must be killed. Softness to tyrants needs to end. 
 
Atheists deny the existence of God. At least that kinda makes them neutral. Some atheists take Christers to task and expose the evil of their God and their own evil hypocrisy for believing in him, worshiping him and spreading his evil lies. We need to stop the lie spreading. It's like in a war. We need to destroy the munition factories, fuel depots and supply lines. We need to destroy the moral of God's troopers and turn them against God. We need to create chaos in their ranks. We need to turn them against evil.  

We need to create effective tactics and strategies that will destroy faith. 

How to Kill God and Reduce Religion

Monotheism - single-god religion - has done more harm to humanity than any other belief system. Violence, ignorance, sectarianism, intolerance, backwardness and confused morality are the biggest side-effect of dogmatic belief in God. To win, for humanity, we need to remove the sources of fundamentalism and bigotry that hold back entire cultures. If you argue well, presenting facts and taking emotions into account, we can win the war against the idea of god by reducing the firmness of belief in it. Any reduction in the power of organized monotheistic religions is a victory. If you argue with a theist long enough and well enough they may become agnostics, disillusioned with revelation yet still hold the belief that something divine exists. This is still a victory. How do you attain these victories? Because religion and god-belief is based on wishful thinking and delusion, the best weapon we have is the truth.


1. Debating With Individuals

1.1. Things to Bring Up in Debates

#determinism #evil #god #life #philosophy #religion #suffering #theodicy #theology

1.2. Present Yourself Calmly and Be Personable

Most people do not belong to a religion because they have rationally chosen it after purveying the available evidence. Most people's justifications for their own religion are concocted after they self-identify. This is because most people fall into a religion socially or through parental pressure. It is only occasionally that a person sits down to examine the merits of competing religions, and most the time when they do this, it is because a new influence in their life is already changing them. Psychological, emotional and societal pressure is generally much more important than factual debate.

So to release a person from the intellectual shackles of religion, you generally need to approach them with the right demeanor, acting responsibly, calmly, confidently, but never being self-glorifying or sanctimonious. If they think you are worthless, a loser, biased, then they will not accept your arguments. If they start off thinking you are biased, as they probably will if you present yourself with different religious beliefs to them, then the way to overcome their judgement is to be a professional and polite in all conversation with them. Make them see you as considered and upstanding; you must gain respect.

If you present yourself, calmly, rationally, peacefully, in a friendly manner, then you can make a large amount of ground without even trying. Closely knit religious social groups often become deluded as to what atheists are like, for example in some parts of the Bible belt, or in some entire countries, atheists can be rare. Smash misconceptions by simply being nice.

There are too many dumb atheists who argue are arrogant and annoying and these only serve to solidify the theist's opinion that they are in the moral high ground and silently strengthen their commitment to their current position.

Fundamentalists have to be taken carefully, and slowly, and the best line of attack is to come over as friendly and acceptably as you can. In effect you have to get much deeper into them, you have to make a bigger (and unobtrusive) impression on them. They are very willing to jump on to a defensive rant, or to block you out, if you show signs of arguing offensively ("like all the others"). They love to find ways in which they can prove they are better than you in order to "prove" that their theology is equally untouchable.

Bad psychology will prevent your arguments from making an impact, and can turn a winning argument into a lose. Good psychology will turn a draw into a win and give you a good reputation as an arguer rather a reputation for being argumentative.

Develop your look and your appearance. Yes, we are using every trick in the book here! Dress smartly but no ties for crying out loud - that's what evangelists and mormons wear! Keep good eye contact, don't look at your feet as you talk. When they are wrong say, "Are you sure?". Even if you cannot prove something you can state, "Are you sure that's true?" and you allow them to think about the possibility that it isn't. Smile! Smile when they make a good point! Smile when they say something clever! Reward them for any intelligent comments, as it is through intelligence and good-thinking that they will eventually save themselves.

1.3. What Not To Do: Forceful Arguments, However Factual, Can Increase Religiosity!

Do not constantly engage those around you in powerful argumentation. Have more skill than to approach everyone with a philosophical sledgehammer. In most areas in Europe religion is something that other people get up to. The average liberal European does not participate in his own religion. If we are stupid, and suddenly barrage them with theology we can have the reverse effect to what we intend. We can cause them to pay attention to their religion when previously they paid none. We should not force an issue when they are religiously placid and undefined, we can end up turning a neutral situation into a loss when the original situation was fine. Restraint!

So:

  • If someone is living a fine life, mostly devoid of religion, and they themselves do not talk about religion, then there is little need to bother them. By assaulting them with questions about their little beliefs, you may turn them into bigger parts of their self-image.

  • Constantly engaging people in a demanding way causes a psychological arms war, where their responses are against your approach rather than your arguments. Be peaceful and considerate, yet clever. Commend them on their (attempted!) good arguments - make them feel good about their debate with you, even while you are dismantling their crazy ideas. Be civil!

  • Watch out for reverse psychology. If we broadcasted a news report saying how bad, uncouth and dangerous a music group is then we will almost definitely cause their sales to rise! Be careful that your criticisms work for the person you are talking to. There is no point deriding Christian ideas about female inferiority, if you happen to be talking to a person who agrees with that stance!

  • Be courteous in public. Do not spit upon Christians, cursing them as a group. This is known as prejudice, pure and simple. Challenge doctrine, and avoid personal insults. You will only make people gather around your victim and defend them (in their hearts or even in action). Remain focused on the important elements of fact, history and philosophy.

So, be wise in your battles. Don't conduct a verbal war - conduct a gentle, peaceful conversation. Scale up the harshness if they are themselves experienced debaters, but always remain civil, polite, giving compliments and encouraging them when they use their brains! Don't stay permanently negative and destructive because their only recourse will be to reject everything you say! Sweeten your harsh, cold truths about the universe with smatterings of social niceties!

1.4. When to Give Up

  • Fundamentalists are often immune to both logical arguments, historical facts and psychological pressure. They have self-identified with their religion and fought so many battles over it that they have invested too much time to it to give it up. They no longer know or understand their own true motives, and they can be impossible to deal with. They will often write volumes, have strange ways of approaching problems that defeat reasonable analysis, and are utterly convinced of their own position. Their stance has hardened due to many debates and the chances are they've seen every argument before. It doesn't really matter who debates them, or what 'evidence' their opponents have. These people are lost, and only internal change can help them. Present the facts to them, present evidence, but don't bother arguing.

  • Crazy people who do not engage in actual debate, but who respond with 'random' rants about random things, write at length, yet don't seem to make much sense. There are lots of these outgoing people on the internet. You may pick up on particular mistakes and reply to them, but you can guarantee they will not listen, and will reply with reams of waffle, often using words in strange ways, completely abandoning logic, and using lots of CAPS LOCK. Do not waste time on these people.

  • Those who do not learn are not worth it. Some people simply cannot be educated - not because they're too indoctrinated or crazy, but because they do not know enough about the world, and are incapable of figuring stuff out. They will lack all knowledge of science, maths, probably struggle with written English, and resist all attempts to teach them stuff. Think about what exactly the point of arguing with these people is. Telling them to read a book on a relevant topic is often akin to insulting them. Insult them, and move on.

2. Aiding the Decline of Religiosity

2.1. Sociological Anti-Religious Forces

I detail the wider sociological factors that are undermining religion on a page on www.HumanReligions.info, "Anti-Religious Forces: Specific Factors Fuelling Secularisation" by Vexen Crabtree (2011). Get in league with the representatives of these movements and ideas! The menu of that page is:

2.2. Tax the Churches

The single biggest step, possibly unlikely, is to tax the Church on all its income, property and land and watch it instantly fold up to a fraction of its size. Charity is a good cause, but Church is not the way to do it. Support taxing of churches, demand it, and make it known that good people will continue to do good work whether or not they have the "charitable" backing of a church. Nearly all religion-based charity work is a backdoor method of evangelism, and at worse, a subtle method of outright extortion, with most money going to pay the wages of churchpeople. It is all more efficient it charities are run by secular, non-religious folk, who have no church overheads or expensive cathedrals to maintain!

2.3. Those Who Are Oppressed by Traditional Religion: Women, Gays and Minority Religions

Women, LGBT communities and minority religions - as well as competing denominations - all must unite in order to topple the horrendous dogmas of established religions. The problem is, when one falls, another rises in its place. So the true battle must be fought against establishment religions in general. Warn people about the horrors that occur when religious dogmas are enforced alongside civil law; the more power the ruling religion has, the more the minorities and others have to lose. Stonewall, Human Rights bodies and many other campaigners have all fought long battles against Christianity and Islam; embrace these bodies in the fight against tyranny and delusion. The more members these defenders have, the more governments are likely to listen to them in their fights against religious oppression.

2.4. Debating Online

Forums and usenet are the best place you can practice, hone and perfect your arguing techniques. Some of these will remain archived for decades to come so always be respectful yet forthright. You will learn to be precise, to think quick and to read around the subject area because people with all sorts of specialities will be arguing with you. Practice with this will make you knowledgeable in a practical, real-life kind of way. Join Christian mailing lists and engage in arguments. Ignore the fundamentalists once they stop being logical, and stick to what we do best: Logic, historical facts that contradict religion, philosophy and common sense.

Work alongside a friend who is constantly looking to point out your mistakes in logic and fact, and who you sit with whilst debating. Do not argue when you are clearly wrong - publicly admitting someone has come up with a good argument will give you respect and make others more likely to listen to you, and to be civil.

2.5. Creating a Website

My own websites have achieved much in the way of educating people, bringing people out of delusion, and helping other debaters attain the same goals. Creating a simple website is easy and free. Approach the content in a few ways:

  • Create a site with a religious theme and title. As there are already many good, skeptical websites out there, with a wealth of important information on them, simply link to them. Then, at the very least, you have aided the effort of others again skepticism against wishful thinking and delusion.

  • Investigate one area of religion, or, one particular belief, or one particular event in history, and analyze it from a sensible, thinking, skeptical point of view. Link to more general websites on this page. Become an expert, or at least respected, as an author of that particular page (or pages) on that particular subject. Mastering one tiny field is always a promising beginning!

  • If you debate lots online, then, document some of your best clashes, and turn them into a webpage. When similar arguments arise, you can use your own published notes to aid yourself. Over time, you can build up a knowledge base which others will also find useful. This was the beginning of my Bane of Monotheism website.

Over time, your creation can blossom - or it can sit there and simply provide some links to other websites, helping those sites prosper. Plenty of advice on how to build websites is available online.

3. Conclusions

It is gratifying to be able to change someone's opinion, or to defeat them in an argument. Arguing on usenet, when done properly, is not a waste of time but a strong source of confidence and experience. You will become familiar with your own weaknesses and develop good textual arguing skills - as long as you avoid hot-headed counterproductive personal vendettas!

Arguing with street preachers, promoting occult religions and having a knowledge of theology will aid you, along with your reputation and image, in gaining an air of authority when you speak to others. Usenet is a good place to learn to use speciality words easily and quickly. And the argumentative atmosphere makes it a much more challenging and stimulating place than other methods of learning that are devoid of such in-your-face competition.

About This Page

 






Most US Covid Deaths Could Have Been Prevented

 


Matthew Brown, USA TODAY

Former White House coronavirus response coordinator Dr. Deborah Birx said most coronavirus deaths in the United States were avoidable, during a CNN interview for a documentary scheduled to air Sunday.

In an excerpt from "Covid War: The Pandemic Doctors Speak Out," Birx said that while many deaths in the first wave of the coronavirus pandemic were likely inevitable, the lethality of later waves could have been greatly reduced if the U.S. had "mitigated earlier ... paused earlier and actually done" greater social distancing and shutdown measures.

"I look at it this way," Birx told CNN's Chief Medical Correspondent Sanjay Gupta. "The first time, we have an excuse. There were about 100,000 deaths that came from that original surge. All of the rest of them, in my mind, could have been mitigated or decreased substantially."

In March 2020, Birx and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases head Dr. Anthony Fauci warned that nearly 240,000 would die from the coronavirus if precautions were not taken. To date, there are nearly 550,000 deaths from COVID-19 in the United States, according to the Johns Hopkins University Coronavirus Tracker.

In December, Birx said she would retire from her position as White House coronavirus coordinator amid the Biden administration's transition into government. The move was widely seen in response to her tarnished reputation among Democrats, who saw her as an enabler of the Trump administration's COVID-19 strategy.

"The malicious incompetence that resulted in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths starts at the top, with the former President and his enablers," Rep. Ted Lieu, D-Calif., said in a tweet responding to Birx's recent comments. "And who was one of his enablers? Dr. Birx, who was afraid to challenge his unscientific rhetoric and wrongfully praised him."

Birx's comments are among a series of comments the former White House aide has made since leaving the Trump administration. Many public health officials in the federal government often clashed with former President Donald Trump over the administration's handling of the coronavirus pandemic and Trump's public comments contradicting scientific evidence.

"I can't tell you how many discussions we had on, how do we get the message out realizing what's happening at the most senior levels of the White House," Birx told ABC News earlier this month. The longtime physician added that Trump's comments directing people to inject disinfectant into themselves made her "extraordinarily uncomfortable."

In a January CBS News interview, Birx also said “there were people who definitely believed that [the coronavirus] was a hoax" in the White House and that Trump's public comments often directly contradicted guidelines she and other health officials would give governors and local leaders about the pandemic.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Deborah Birx: Most COVID-19 deaths after first 100,000 were avoidable

OpEd: The upside is, most deaths have been Trump supporters and will be Trump supporters for years to come. God in his insatiable and impulsive need to see people suffer and die he didn't stop to think that most of the death from COVID-19 would be Trump supporters. You fucked yourself this time God! HA!

Thursday, February 25, 2021

God is a Baby Killer

Don't deny it. God is a baby killer. God kills babies in the womb and the Bible proves it. Who are you going to believe some greedy right wing preacher or God?

Saturday, February 13, 2021

COVID-19 Was Caused By God


 

God loves it when we suffer because fools pray to God to get the suffering to stop. God's sadistic lust is getting a real boost from COVID-19.  Many of us are holed up while God's pecker sucking servants are out spreading the virus. The good part is, a lot of evil Trumpers are dying from COVID-19 but the bad part is a lot of us have been holed up since March 2020. 

The red states are under reporting COVID-19 cases and deaths. Most of the COVID-19 deaths are Trumper and now with the super bowl parties and Spring break there will be another surge and God will be cumming is his pants. 

In 6 or 8 months most humans in the US will have been vaccinated and many MAGAts will refuse the vaccine and about 2% of them will die. Since God is a Republican he's fucking himself by fucking his MAGAts. When you figure that people of voting age are the ones most likely to die from COVID-19 and Trumpers are fat and sickly. A 1% reduction in MAGAts means that the 74 million MAGAts who voted for Trump will soon be 73 million. While this won't flip every district to Democrat it will flip many of them blue in congressional races.

Last updated: February 13, 2021, 8:45 EST


 United States Coronavirus Cases: 28,196,964

Deaths: 496,063 (mostly MAGAts)

Saturday, September 28, 2019

Only An Evil God Would Allow Suffering

A god could not have created a more vicious cycle if it tried: Tying the very existence of life with the necessary killing of other life is the work of an evil genius, not of an all-powerful and all-loving god.
-- Vexen Crabtree



The Dominance of Death in Nature

A god could not have created a more vicious cycle if it tried: Tying the very existence of life with the necessary killing of other life is the work of an evil genius, not of an all-powerful and all-loving god.
-- Vexen Crabtree
The main piece of evidence here is biological matter and the food chain. All life dies - all biological life decays, erodes, fades, becomes diseased and ill if it does not sustain itself. To sustain itself nearly all life, except the least living elements of life, kills and eats other life. If not this, then it consumes biological matter at the expense of other living beings; the fight for food is also a case of living beings being required to outdo each other merely to survive.

If life was created, and not simply the result of undirected unconscious evolution (as seems sensible), this is surely the worst possible way to have created life. It appears very much that life cannot survive without causing suffering for other life. A god could not have created a more vicious cycle if it tried: Tying the very existence of life with the necessary killing of other life is the work of an evil genius, not of an all-powerful and all-loving god, that could choose if it wanted to sustain all life immediately and forever with manna from heaven. But it seems such an all-powerful good god doesn't exist.
Satanism is about realityIn reality, all living beings die. There are no exceptions. Satanism, in embracing life and indulgence, is in effect striving against death. However, it is inevitable that death will eventually winSatan, representing reality and the Human condition, symbolizes the victory of death. This eternal truth is more meaningful and potent than deceitful symbols of life, of reincarnation and of other spiritual pipe dreams.
Sensible refrain:

Life exists as a precarious balance of self-replicating chemicals, and such a balancing game is always bound to be temporary, pending major technological discoveries or serious and continuous genetic engineering. That such extreme measures have to be taken to prolong life is evidence to the fact that life is incidental to the universe, a by-product that exists due purely due to statistical likelihood, and that life is temporary is because all the physical constructs of the universe are temporary. However, if a deity was believed in, it would be sensible to assume that it was evil and created life as such a disharmony in order to cause the suffering and pain of living beings.


1.3. Genetic Diseases and Unintelligent Design3

Christian doctrine holds that mankind suffers because of sin, which we choose as a result of free will. Without free will there would be no sin, and therefore no suffering. But it is obvious that a great number of the genetic diseases reviewed above on this page are inherited from the moment of conception, and therefore are nothing to do with choice or character. Not only that, but genetic diseases affect all species, although, as a result of mankind's increasing lifespan, many diseases have come to fore in humankind due to senescence. It is possible to construct evolutionary trees tracing the history of a faulty inherited gene through species by looking at which species emerged from what predecessors (phylostratigraphy), and through other genetic techniques. Many faulty genes that afflict mankind originated in previous species that existed before humankind emerged4, therefore, it is a logical impossibility that the existence of mutations and diseases are a result of human sin. In other words, the suffering that results from genetic diseases has affected all species throughout the history of life, and is part of the fundamental process of evolution. It has been noted that this is a hefty piece of evidence that if there is a god, it isn't the good-natured creator that traditional religions believe in. [...]
Genetic diseases afflict not only mankind, but also all other animal species, and all other forms of life down to the simplest bacteria and harmless single-cell lifeforms floating in the oceans. In all these species and in plants there are seemingly endless cases of genetic flaws and problems. Perhaps the best indicator of how badly life is 'designed' is the stark reality that 99% of all species have gone extinct. The food chain requires that nearly every living being survives by killing other creatures to eat for food, and species naturally expand to use up all local resources, limiting the success of other species. Everywhere in nature, predator-and-prey chains are central to life. This isn't a design for life, but a design of strife and violence. The genetic defects of nature, and the violence and strife of the natural world, indicate that life was not designed by a good-natured creator god but maybe by an evil one. My favourite phrase to describe all of this waste and bad design is one I picked up from Paul Kurtz in the Skeptical Inquirer:
The existence of vestigial organs in many species, including the human species, is hardly evidence for design; for they have no discernable function. And the extinction of millions of species on the planet is perhaps evidence for unintelligent design.
Paul Kurtz (2006)5

Thursday, August 1, 2019

Godwhacker by Steely Dan


In the beginning We could hang with the dude
But it's been too much of nothing Of that stank attitude
Now they curse your name And there's a bounty on your face
It's your own fault daddy GodWhacker's on the case 

We track your almighty ass Thru seven heaven-worlds
Me, Slinky Redfoot And our trusty angel-girls
And when the stars bleed out That be the fever of the chase
You better get gone poppie GodWhacker's on the case

Be very very quiet Clock everything you see
Little things might matter later At the start of the end of history

Climb up the glacier Across bridges of light
We sniff you, Big Tiger In the forest of the night '
Cause there's no escape From the Rajahs of Erase
You better run run run GodWhacker's on the case

Be very very quiet Clock everything you see
Little things might matter later At the start of the end of history
Yes we are the GodWhackers Who rip and chop and slice
For crimes beyond imagining It's time to pay the price

You better step back son Give the man some whackin' space
You know this might get messy GodWhacker's on the case 




Brilliant song, one of my favorites. The meaning is surprisingly simple; for Steely Dan anyway. In Donald Fagen's book Eminent Hipsters (Well worth a read btw) he says: "One more word about my mother: She died horribly of Alzheimer's. One time, after not seeing her for a while, I visited her in a nursing home in Ohio. As I walked towards her, she stared at me with great interest and then said, "You know, I've always liked you very much." Not long after that, she was gone. How do you like that? A couple of days later, I started writing a lyric for this song "Godwhacker," which Walter and I completed and recorded for a Steely Dan CD."

 It's about an elite squad of assassins whose sole assignment is to find a way into heaven and take out God. If the Deity actually existed, what sane person wouldn't consider this to be justifiable homicide?" -----------------------------

So yeah. The lyrics are kind of straight forward. However it does give a whole new philosophical dimension to the song. The concept of if a God did exist, he surely deserves punished for his blatant lack of care etc. Whether you agree with the concept or not, or if you just don't care, it still adds a very deep philosophical meaning to the song.

He Gives Us All His Love by Randy Newman



He gives us all his love
He gives us all his love
He's smiling down on us
From up above
And he's giving us all his love

See the source image
He knows how hard we're trying
He hears the babies crying
See the source image
He sees the old folks dying
And he gives us all his love
If you need someone to talk to
You can always talk to him
And if you need someone to lean on
You can lean on him
He give us all his love
He gives us all his love
He's smiling down on us
From up above
And he's giving us all his love
He's smiling down on us
From up above
He gives us all his love

Misotheism is the "hatred of God" or "hatred of the gods" (from the Greek adjective μισόθεος "hating the gods"